By Fjordman

The EU’s official watchdog against “racism” complains that native Europeans do not censor themselves enough. Notice that there is not a single word about the massive wave of racist violence facing white natives in Western Europe. We’re just supposed to shut up while the Multiculturalists dismantle our nations and use them as dumping grounds for the excess population growth of Islamic countries:

This is from Associated Press (24 June): EU Rights Agency Warns Racist Violence Persists in Bloc

Racist violence and discrimination persist across the European Union, and most members of the 27-nation bloc aren’t taking advantage of tough legislation to crack down on the scourge, the EU’s rights agency warned. Britain and France lead a list of nine countries credited with actively fighting racism and xenophobia, but most other EU members aren’t making the most of a tough EU-wide “racial equality directive,” the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights said in its annual report. “Racism, discrimination, entrenched disadvantage, racist violence and harassment have remained a fact of life for many individuals in Europe,” the agency warned. “Effective and dissuasive sanctions are crucial to fight ethnic and racial discrimination,” it said. “Without these, discriminatory attitudes and behavioral patterns are unlikely to change and victims remain defenseless.”
From 2006-2007, Britain punished 95 offenders with sanctions – more than all of the other 26 member states combined — said the Vienna-based agency, which polices the EU in an effort to stamp out discrimination in employment, housing, education, health care and other key areas. It also singled out Bulgaria, France, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Finland and Sweden for making good use of existing legal tools to fight discrimination. By contrast, a dozen EU member states — the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal and Slovenia – issued no sanctions at all during the same period.

One of the organizations cooperating with the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency is the Swedish left-wing organization Expo, which most of my readers should be familiar with. One of the co-founders of Expo, Tobias Hübinette, wrote this in 1996:

To feel and even think that the white race is inferior in every conceivable way is natural with regards to its history and current actions. Let the Western countries of the white race perish in blood and suffering. Long live the multicultural, racially mixed and classless ecological society! Long live anarchy!

According to his CV, Tobias Hübinette worked for Expo until at least 1997. In other words, he continued doing research for this “anti-racist” organization after having advocated the extermination of whites and the violent destruction of an entire civilization. Hübinette has continued promoting “Multiculturalism,” even received awards, and is currently working for the Multicultural Centre of Botkyrka, Sweden. To some, “Multiculturalism” apparently means “death to white people and their culture,” nothing more and nothing less. Read the rest of this entry »

Topics: Anti-White Racism, The EU | No Comments »

Thank You, Mr. Horn

By Rob | July 1, 2008

At left is Mr. Joe Horn.

In November 2007, he confronted the two unsightly-looking illegal invaders pictured below who were burglarizing his neighbor’s home in Texas…He along with his 12-gauge shotgun, that is. The two invaders will never harm an innocent ever again. The incident was famously captured on a 911 audio recording now heard around the world.

Today, a Harris County, Texas grand jury correctly exonerated Mr. Horn of all charges for his brave defense of his himself and his community.

In the aftermath of the shootings, there were certain Negro agitators who attempted to seize the opportunity to cry ‘Racism’ as Mr. Horn is White and the two suspects were some sort of Negro/Latino mongrelization. They attempted to stage a ‘protest’ in the same community where the shooting took place, but were immediately run out of town by the friends, neighbors and supports of Mr. Horn.

Mr. Horn is to be celebrated for his courage and bravery. He is a fine example of a White man unwilling to be victimized by the low-life scum invading America to prey on right-living families.

Please see the links HERE ,HERE, and HERE for more information about this incredible White man.

My family and I would like to thank Mr. Horn for making the world a safer place. The world needs more men like you. (R.C.)

The following story by BRIAN ROGERS and RUTH RENDON

A Harris County grand jury decided today that Joe Horn should not be charged with a crime for shooting two burglary suspects he confronted outside his neighbor’s home in Pasadenalast fall.

The decision to clear Horn of wrongdoing came two weeks after the grand jury began considering evidence in the case, including Horn’s testimony last week.

Horn, a 62-year-old retiree, became the focus of an intense public debate after the Nov. 14 shootings. Many supporters praised him as a hero for using deadly force to protect property, while others dismissed him as a killer who should have heeded a 911 operator’s instructions to stay in his house and wait for police.

Horn called authorities after hearing breaking glass and seeing two men climb through a window into his next-door neighbor’s home in the 7400 block of Timberline.

The 911 operator urged Horn to remain inside, but he went outside with his 12-gauge shotgun and came face-to-face with Diego Ortiz, 30, and Hernando Riascos Torres, 38.

According to a transcript of Horn’s 911 call, which he made about 2 p.m., the operator repeatedly urged Horn to stay in his house, but Horn said he did not believe it would be right to let the burglars get away.

“Well, here it goes, buddy,” Horn can be heard telling the operator. “You hear the shotgun clicking and I’m going.”

The operator replies: “Don’t go outside.”

Then the tape records Horn warning someone: “Move and you’re dead!” Two quick shots can be heard, followed by a pause and then a third shot.

(Read Original Article)

Topics: 2nd Amendment Rights, Negro-on-White Crime, Someone You Should Know, Top News, White Pride World Wide | No Comments »

The Jewish Role in Destroying America

By Rob | June 30, 2008

by James Buchanan

Throughout history Jews always invaded the richest nation, that is willing to let them in. For thousands of years, Jews moved from Egypt to Persia to Babylon always in pursuit of a rich host population that they could exploit. Jews always try to ingratiate and entrench themselves in their host nation. Jewish women try to become the wife or mistress of the king, emperor or president. Jewish advisers worm their way up, trying to become powerful advisers. (Remember Henry Kissinger, Paul Wolfowitz, Robert Reich.) American presidents from FDR to George W. Bush have been surrounded by Jewish advisers.

The Jews are a race, not a religion. They have alien characteristics and morality. There is a much greater proportion of homosexuals in the Jewish population. Jews -almost universally- believe that homosexuality should be protected and tolerated while in most of Europe for thousands of years homosexuality was seen an an extreme perversity that was punished severely. The Jews only seem to feel comfortable if they are surrounded by dozens of other races or “Diversity” as they like to call it. Most White people would be perfectly happy to live in an all-White society, but Jews keep using their political influence and power to invite millions of Latinos, Africans and Hindus into America –against the will of the White host population.

The Jews are typically middlemen, lawyers and usurers who grow rich off the host population, often reducing the host people to poverty. Sometimes the host population rebels against the Jews. One famous example involved the Persians. Persian nationalists grew tired of Jewish usurers and they had persuaded the Persian king to set a deadline for the Jews to leave Persia. Jewish historians claim that the Persian nationalists wanted to “kill” the Jews. This -by the way- is another characteristic of the Jews. They always exaggerate their suffering or the threat to their population. The Jews don’t want to admit that one nation after another has expelled them as “undesirables.” Instead, according to the Jews, “hateful irrational” people throughout history have repeatedly persecuted them “for no reason.” A Jewish woman, Esther, seduced the Persian King, who then executed all the anti-Semites, who wanted to expel the Jews. The Jews celebrate this slaughter of their enemies as the Feast of Purim.

The Jews have been expelled from every nation in Europe at least once. Spain expelled the Jews in 1492. The Spanish people then enjoyed a Golden Age of exploration and discovery once the Jews were gone. Germany removed the Jews from power in 1933. Germany then enjoyed a great cultural renaissance and was the first White nation to pull itself out of the Great Depression.

The Jews of course could not tolerate a White nation -free of Jews- enjoying prosperity while the Jew-controlled nations of the world were still locked in a depression. The Jews began a propaganda campaign against Germany. The Jewish World Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. The Jews began using their media in Britain and France to push for war against Germany. Territories stolen from Germany after World War One were stubbornly withheld. Poland held a rich coal field in Silesia as well as a “corridor” that cut off East Prussia from the rest of Germany. When Poland refused to return these German territories in 1939, Hitler invaded Poland to recover that territory. Britain and France then used this incident as an excuse to declare war on Germany.

(Continue Reading Original Article)

Topics: Jewish Supremacism, The Israel Lobby in the US, Uncategorized, Zionism | No Comments »

Keystone State Skinheads Plan to Attend “Anti-hate” Summit

By Rob | June 29, 2008

(*Editors Note: Why would people wishing to express an alternative view point in a civil manner at a public meeting require “necessary resources” from the police? Necessary resources for what, to keep public opinion in check? We may not have a right to speak but we certainly have a right to attend and participate in an orderly fashion.)

Members of the Keystone State Skinheads are planning to attend the event this Sunday called “A New Day in Luzerne County — Building on the Strength of Our Diversity.” The Wilkes-Barre chapter of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is hosting the event

“Yeah, I’ll probably be there,” said Steve Smith, a member of KSS. “We want to let the community know we’re not dangerous and there are a lot of false stereotypes about us.”

But Ron Felton, NAACP chapter president, won’t let the group speak at his event.

“It’s an event that’s open to the public, but I choose not to provide them a platform to present their rhetoric,” Felton said. “If they want to speak, let them have their own event.”

The event will take place Sunday at 2:30 p.m. at Wilkes University’s Dorothy Dickson Darte Center.

Felton said he decided to put together the anti-hate summit after KSS members posted fliers urging community members to “preserve our heritage” around Martin Luther King Jr. Day and after the vandalism of Congregation Ohav Zedek in Wilkes-Barre in April. Nora Rynkeiwicz, an 18-year-old from Factoryville charged with spray painting anti-Semitic graffiti on the synagogue, has no connections with KSS.

“After these events, we thought maybe there was a need for people to come together,” Felton said. “We invited the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission to give a presentation on white supremacist groups.”

Smith first expressed his desire to speak at the event in an interview with a local publication earlier this month. But neither he nor KSS ever formally submitted a request to the NAACP to speak at the event. Still, Smith was disappointed in the NAACP’s dismissal of having the group at the event.

Felton disagrees. He said since it is an NAACP event, he was not required to provide equal speaking time to groups with such opposing views.

“This is not normally something we engage in,” Felton said. “It’s a program designed by the Human Relations Commission. We’re not going to have a debate about who’s right and who’s wrong. We want to talk about how we can move forward without hate.”

Smith, who was arrested in Scranton with three other men in 2003 on ethnic intimidation charges, said he and other KSS members would still attend the event. Fearing a possible protest, the Wilkes-Barre Police Department is preparing to have a force at Sunday’s event.

(Continue Reading)

Topics: Keystone State Skinheads, White Pride World Wide, White Revolution | No Comments »

On the Impossibility of Limited Government and the Prospects for a Second American Revolution

By Rob | June 28, 2008

by Hans-Hermann Hoppe

In a recent survey, people of different nationalities were asked how proud they were to be American, German, French, etc., and whether or not they believed that the world would be a better place if other countries were just like their own. The countries ranking highest in terms of national pride were the United States and Austria. As interesting as it would be to consider the case of Austria, we shall concentrate here on the United States and the question of whether and to what extent the American claim can be justified.

In the following, we will identify three main sources of American national pride, the first two of which are justified sources of pride, while the third actually represents a fateful error. Finally, we will look at how this error might be repaired.

I - A Country of Pioneers

The first source of national pride is the memory of America’s not-so-distant colonial past as a country of pioneers.

In fact, the English settlers coming to North America were the last example of the glorious achievements of what Adam Smith referred to as “a system of natural liberty”: the ability of men to create a free and prosperous commonwealth from scratch. Contrary to the Hobbesian account of human nature — homo homini lupus est — the English settlers demonstrated not just the viability but also the vibrancy and attractiveness of a stateless, anarchocapitalist social order. They demonstrated how, in accordance with the views of John Locke, private property originated naturally through a person’s original appropriation — his purposeful use and transformation — of previously unused land (wilderness). Furthermore, they demonstrated that, based on the recognition of private property, division of labor, and contractual exchange, men were capable of protecting themselves effectively against antisocial aggressors — first and foremost by means of self-defense (less crime existed then than exists now), and as society grew increasingly prosperous and complex, by means of specialization, i.e., by institutions and agencies such as property registries, notaries, lawyers, judges, courts, juries, sheriffs, mutual defense associations, and popular militias.[1]

Moreover, the American colonists demonstrated the fundamental sociological importance of the institution of covenants: of associations of linguistically, ethnically, religiously, and culturally homogeneous settlers led by and subject to the internal jurisdiction of a popular leader-founder to ensure peaceful human cooperation and maintain law and order.[2]

II - The American Revolution

The second source of national pride is the American Revolution.

In Europe there had been no open frontiers for centuries, and the intra-European colonization experience lay in the distant past. With the growth of the population, societies had assumed an increasingly hierarchical structure: of free men (freeholders) and servants, lords and vassals, overlords, and kings. While distinctly more stratified and aristocratic than colonial America, the so-called feudal societies of medieval Europe were also typically stateless social orders.

A state, in accordance with generally accepted terminology, is defined as a compulsory territorial monopolist of law and order (an ultimate decision maker). Feudal lords and kings did not typically fulfill the requirements of a state; they could only “tax” with the consent of the taxed, and on his own land every free man was as much a sovereign (ultimate decision maker) as the feudal king was on his.[3] However, in the course of many centuries, these originally stateless societies had gradually transformed into absolute — statist — monarchies. While they had initially been acknowledged voluntarily as protectors and judges, European kings had at long last succeeded in establishing themselves as hereditary heads of state. Resisted by the aristocracy but helped along by the “common people,” they had become absolute monarchs with the power to tax without consent and to make ultimate decisions regarding the property of free men.

These European developments had a twofold effect on America. On the one hand, England was also ruled by an absolute king, at least until 1688, and when the English settlers arrived on the new continent, the king’s rule was extended to America. Unlike the settlers’ founding of private property and their private — voluntary and cooperative — production of security and administration of justice, however, the establishment of the royal colonies and administrations was not the result of original appropriation (homesteading) and contract — in fact, no English king had ever set foot on the American continent — but of usurpation (declaration) and imposition.

(Continue To Read Original Article)

Topics: White Culture and Values, White History, White Revolution | No Comments »

Calculating the Exact Date of the Trojan Horse: 1188 BC, thanks to an eclipse in Homer

By ginny | June 28, 2008

By Steve Connor

The Odyssey is one of the great works of ancient Western literature, written eight centuries before the birth of Christ and four centuries after the fall of Troy. Generations of classicists have pored over the many lines of Homer’s epic description of the long journey taken by the hero Odysseus to his home island of Ithaca. Now two scholars have found evidence to support the idea that one line, in the poem’s 20th book, refers to a total solar eclipse that occurred on 16 April 1178 BC – the day when Odysseus returned home to kill his wife’s suitors. If true, this would date the fall of Troy itself to precisely 1188 BC.

It takes Odysseus 10 years to reach Ithaca after the 10-year Trojan war. During his time away, his young son, Telemachus, has grown into a man and his faithful wife, Penelope, is besieged by unruly suitors desperate to gain her hand in marriage.

The Odyssey is the story of a long and great journey involving the beautiful nymph Calypso – who enslaves Odysseus for seven years as her lover – helpful divinities such as Athena and vengeful gods such as Poseidon.

Odysseus eventually escapes from Calypso, survives a shipwreck where all his compatriots are drowned and is befriended by the Phaeacians, a race of skilled mariners who finally deliver the hero safely to Ithaca, where he takes on the guise of a beggar to learn how things stand at home.

It is during this later phase of The Odyssey that Homer is said to make reference to a total solar eclipse. The key phrase comes in a speech by the seer Theoclymenus, who foresees the deaths of the unruly young men who sought the hand of Penelope while Odysseus was away. It ends with the words: “The Sun has been obliterated from the sky, and an unlucky darkness invades the world.”

The idea that The Odyssey refers to a total solar eclipse, when the Moon blocks out the Sun completely, is not new. It was first suggested by ancient scholars, but it was only in the 1920s that astronomers were able to calculate that such an eclipse over Greece around that time could only have taken place on 16 April 1178 BC.

(Continue Reading Original Article)

Topics: White Culture and Values, White History | No Comments »

9-11: The Zionist Involvement In The Crime And The Cover-up

By Rob | June 27, 2008

By Les Visible

Every now and then as time approaches for a new entry here… every now and then I just don’t know what to say. So I sit here and I think about it and it isn’t very long before my thoughts return, as they always do, to 9/11 and the prima facie evidence of both Zionist involvement in the act and the cover-up in the aftermath.

The terror State of Israel has had its hand in so many things; told so many lies, caused so many deaths that it has taken on a surreal appearance in my mind. Hardly does a day go by when I don’t learn of some new horror that they brought forth upon the planet. Hardly a day goes by when another new lie, or chorus of lies, does not whip across the landscape like rabid bats; routinely and persistently infecting the population with mind parasites of disinformation. We find out that it was Israel that shoehorned Idi Amin into power. We have found that the Entebbe Hollywood rescue was staged. We know now that Israel deliberately bombed the U.S.S. Liberty and that it was no mistake.

We’re told that it was Arabs that instigated the Six Day War and Yom Kippur conflict and then we find that the facts tell a different story altogether. We are told that Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations. The facts tell a different story. The deeper you look the more the story changes. It turns out that Hamas was originally an Israeli creation. I guess that one got away from them. When we look for Al Qaeda cells; a hard job because there is no Al Qaeda, we find that the only one that ever got exposed was a Mossad operation.

Grab an act of genocide in the last century and see who you find at the heart of the matter. How about the Ukraine? How about the Armenian Genocide? You don’t have to look far when it comes to Darfur and Sierra Leone either. All this and Michael Ledeen’s wife too?

The thing is, if you go looking for the truth and sifting the evidence it becomes glaringly apparent soon enough that Zionism and its proponents represent a cynical and viral threat to everything that isn’t them.

When you dissect the real events and official statistics of World War 2 and, of course, World War 1 you find that what you’ve been told is not what was… not at all. You can take what you find and consider it. You can turn it around and look at it from all sides. You can hold it up to the light to see where the light passes through and where the shadows are formed. The more you look, the more you study, the more a particular influence presents itself.

(Continue Reading Original Article)

Topics: Jewish Supremacism, Jewish crimes against Humanity, War for Israel, Zionism | No Comments »

The World Needs More White Children

By Rob | June 26, 2008

By Jeff Jacoby

IN 1965, the population of Italy was 52 million, of which 4.6 million, or just under 9 percent, were children younger than 5. A decade later, that age group had shrunk to 4.3 million - about 7.8 percent of Italians. By 1985, it was down to 3 million and 5.3 percent. Today, the figures are 2.5 million and 4.2 percent.

Young children are disappearing from Italian society, and the end isn’t in sight. According to one estimate by the UN’s Population Division, their numbers will drop to fewer than 1.6 million in 2020, and to 1.3 million by 2050. At that point, they will account for a mere 2.8 percent of the Italian nation.

Italy isn’t alone. There are 1.7 million fewer young children in Poland today than there were in 1960, a 50 percent drop. In Spain 30 years ago, there were nearly 3.3 million young children; there are just 2.2 million today. Across Europe, there were more than 57 million children under 5 in 1960; today, that age group has plummeted to 35 million, a decline of 38 percent.

The world’s population is still growing, thanks to rising longevity. But fertility rates - the average number of children born per woman - are falling nearly everywhere. More and more adults are deciding to have fewer and fewer children. Worldwide, reports the UN, there are 6 million fewer babies and young children today than there were in 1990. By 2015, according to one calculation, there will be 83 million fewer. By 2025, 127 million fewer. By 2050, the world’s supply of the youngest children may have plunged by a quarter of a billion, and will amount to less than 5 percent of the human family.

(Continue Reading Original Article)

Topics: A Future for White Children, White Culture and Values | No Comments »

Interest In White Pride Organizations Surge Under Threat Of Negro President

By Rob | June 24, 2008

With Don Black’s Stormfront.org Leading The Way.

It’s time to wake up, White people.

The Jewish Supremacists that wish to see us crippled and enslaved are gathering together with their dark minions (including many foolish lemmings and certain traitorous Whites) in a great offensive to elect this Negroid hustler, Obama ‘The Magic Negro’. Do you really want this Negro as the leader of America? Then do something: Join the Resistance.

Please join your White brethren in the fight for our very survival. Your children are counting on you; your women are counting on you; your Race is counting on you; Whites all over the world are counting on you. Won’t you join us?

The time is now to take a stand…before it’s too late.

Rob Chapman

The following article is by Eli Saslow

Sen. Barack Obama’s historic victory in the Democratic primaries, celebrated in America and across much of the world as a symbol of racial progress and cultural unity, has also sparked an increase in racist and white supremacist activity, mainly on the Internet, according to leaders of hate groups and the organizations that track them.

Neo-Nazi, skinhead and segregationist groups have reported gains in numbers of visitors to their Web sites and in membership since the senator from Illinois secured the Democratic nomination June 3. His success has aroused a community of racists, experts said, concerned by the possibility of the country’s first black president.

“I haven’t seen this much anger in a long, long time,” said Billy Roper, a 36-year-old who runs a group called White Revolution in Russellville, Ark. “Nothing has awakened normally complacent white Americans more than the prospect of America having an overtly nonwhite president.”

Such groups have historically inflated their influence for self-promotion and as an intimidation technique, and they refused to provide exact membership numbers or open their meetings to a reporter. Leaders acknowledged that their numbers remain very small — “the flat-globe society still has more people than us,” Roper said. But experts said their claims reveal more than hyperbole this time.

“The truth is, we’re finding an explosion in these kinds of hateful sentiments on the Net, and it’s a growing problem,” said Deborah Lauter, civil rights director for the Anti-Defamation League, which monitors hate group activity. “There are probably thousands of Web sites that do this now. I couldn’t even tell you how many are out there because it’s growing so fast.”

Neo-Nazi and white power groups acknowledge that they have little ability to derail Obama’s candidacy, so instead some have decided to take advantage of its potential. White-power leaders who once feared Obama’s campaign have come to regard it as a recruiting tool. The groups now portray his candidacy as a vehicle to disenfranchise whites and polarize America.

Obama has worked hard to minimize the issue of race in his presidential campaign. When asked about divisiveness and hate, he talks instead about ways in which unity between blacks and whites has inspired him. He chose to “reject and denounce” an endorsement from Nation of Islam minister Louis Farrakhan. Obama quit his church after his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., spoke of racism and oppression in the “United States of white America.”

Earlier this month, Obama’s campaign launched a Web site to defuse the false rumors that hate-mongers spread on the Internet. The site lists a series of untruths about Obama — that he is Muslim; that his books contain racist passages; that his wife, Michelle, used the word “whitey” — and discredits them.

“The Obama campaign isn’t going to let dishonest smears spread across the Internet unanswered,” Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said in a statement. “We have to be proactive and fight back.”

But on a Web site run out of a house in West Palm Beach, Fla., the other side is also fighting.

Don Black spends 16 hours each day on his laptop computer reading hundreds of derogatory Obama comments posted on Stormfront.org, a Web site with the motto “white pride world wide.” Black, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, launched the site in 1995 to create a central meeting place for the white power movement. In the wake of Obama’s securing enough delegates for the nomination, Stormfront, he says, has begun to fulfill his vision.

A site that drew a few thousand visitors per day in 2002 has expanded into Black’s full-time job, attracting more than 40,000 unique users each day who can post on 54 different message boards, he said. Black has enlisted 40 moderators and his 19-year-old son to help run Stormfront.

(Continue To Read Original Article)

Topics: A Future for White Children, Obama the Magic Negro, White Pride World Wide | No Comments »

Floods in ‘Chocolate City’ New Orleans and ‘Vanilla’ Iowa: The Difference Is Black and White

By Rob | June 24, 2008

By Mike S. Adams

During the week after Father’s Day, I received a number of interesting emails from readers asking me to write about the dearth of looting after the recent floods in Iowa. Specifically, they wanted me to write about the reason there was so much more looting in New Orleans after Katrina hit the “Chocolate City” in 2005. Of course, the problem involves so much more than race – a factor most people are thinking about, even if they won’t admit it.

That people would oversimplify many post-Katrina problems as “race problems” is unfortunate but somewhat understandable. I recall watching a Fox News reporter standing on a bridge in a flooded area of New Orleans just after Katrina. When the first black individual came wading out of the projects the reporter was simply astounded. Like me, the reporter had no idea that folks had been sitting in the projects waiting for someone to come and escort them out of harm’s way.

It was also sad to see that it was one black face after another emerging from the flooded waters. And it was sadder still that the words “we need” were the first spoken into the camera by these citizens – all utterly unprepared to provide for themselves and their families.

But of course the ugliest scenes were yet to come as looters would turn downtown New Orleans into a place more like downtown Baghdad. Some of the looters who would participate in the destruction of their own neighborhoods would later suggest that they were entitled to loot because of years and years of “oppression.”

Of course, talk of historical oppression goes a long way towards explaining why blacks would be more inclined to loot than whites. But it doesn’t go far towards explaining the fact that looters are predominantly male rather than female. At some point, variables other than race have to be written into the equation.

(Read Original Article)

Topics: Negro-on-White Crime, State of the Modern Negro | No Comments »

The Mechanisms of Revolution

By Rob | June 21, 2008

by: Keith Carney (Keystone United)

That can only be done by winning over the man in the street”. These are words that have been etched into my brain since the very first time I set my eyes on them; thoughts written down almost a hundred years ago by one of the most universally feared & hated men in all of history. That very same man also once proclaimed that “It is the lack of will power, and not the lack of arms which renders us incapable of offering any serious resistance.”

Yet these are more than mere words or simple thoughts, they are clues pointing directly at one of the most vital and timeless keys to revolutionary action that we possess: knowledge & determination. Both of which are necessary in order to establish a functional & progressive movement. And both of which are equally useless without the means to effectively bring them to the attention of the public in a sound and rational manor.

Unfortunately a very sizable amount of individuals and organizations have underestimated these valuable tools and have continued to snub them for quite some time now. Many of these people have opted for what basically amounts to taking the easy way out and avoiding the road of hardship. They resemble children in the sense that they cannot understand the situation at hand, although they usually think that they do, and want to see instant results. They want an overnight A-Z quick fix of some sorts and usually jump ship, leaving us to deal with their mess when things don’t exactly go as they planned.

These are the types of people that call for direct physical actions against some very powerful ideas and adversaries, with the use of some imaginary underground army, one that they envision will suddenly rise up and strike at the right moment. But this is nothing more then a figment of their imagination, it is an imaginary army, and it consists of dreams and wishful thinking powered by distant memories. In reality, this is something that only exists within the back of our frustrated peoples minds and has unfortunately saturated a great deal of our atmosphere, something that has become extremely visible amongst numerous websites, publications and even in a great deal of music.

Yet here we stand, after literally decades of increased turmoil and destruction have taken root all around us and throughout our homeland as these fools continue to sit by idly, partaking in everyday life just like everyone else and stubbornly cling to their ineffective farce of bogus illusions. They have hijacked our movement and continue to hold us hostage as they rattle on and on with their boisterous talk of revolution and the use of force as the only means to achieve our goals. And with all of this what do they have to show for it? They have absolutely nothing except for countless hours of sitting around talking, talking, and talking….

Most of these people lack the educational requirements or even the physical ability & minor dedication that it takes just to lift weights on a regular basis or to even lead a semi-productive life. Much less the discipline and determination that it would take to carry out these types of actions or the type of training regiments involved with preparing for them.

The majority of these people will not deviate from the comforts of their own programmed daily routines or from the confines of their materialistic lifestyles to do so much as read a simple book or to make even the most minimal of sacrifices for our cause. I find it extremely unrealistic to believe that these people will be training for or undertaking any type of physical confrontations against our highly skilled & armed adversaries.

But despite all of this, despite what should be the most unquestionably obvious thing to even the blindest of all individuals, people to this very day are still listening to these frauds fantasize over their fairy tale assassinations with their guns & bombs to trigger an imaginary race war. They foolishly believe that through the use of terror or by removing groups or individuals from our presence that we could suddenly undo decades of corrupt influence and cause the general public to start taking responsibility for their own surroundings.

This is a view held only by those completely out of touch with society, our current situations or completely out of touch with reality altogether. And in many cases it is a view held by people that are too young or inexperienced to know better; ones that act out on their emotions & natural instincts by striking back at what they see taking place around them, which is why it is so important for us to address and correct this on going problem.

(Continue Reading Original Article)

Topics: Keystone State Skinheads, White Pride World Wide, White Revolution | No Comments »

Ayn Rand Was Wrong: Religion And Liberty Can Coexist

By Rob | June 20, 2008

by Walter Block

The relationship of libertarianism and religion is a long and stormy one.

It cannot be denied that Ayn Rand has had a long, strong and deep relationship with libertarianism. Although she dismissed us as “hippies of the right” (pronounced “ippes of de racht”) many of our number are still enthralled by her, inspired by her, and in debt to her for first introducing us to the moral case for free enterprise. I certainly include myself in this category.

One of the strongest influences she has had on the libertarian movement is her belligerent atheism. For many adherents of the freedom philosophy, an aggressive rejection of God and all things religious might as well be the basic axiom of their world-view. I confess that this too was roughly my own belief on the subject, for many years. It is also the perspective of a rich potential donor to the Mises Institute who would have contributed heavily were that organization to change its viewpoint on this matter and take a principled stand against all religion. Happily, Lew Rockwell refused to pervert the mission of his Institute in this regard. Although a believer himself, Rockwell stuck to his guns: the Mises Institute would continue to involve itself in the study of economics and liberty, and not directly with religion at all.

What changed my mind? Why am I now just as much of an obdurate atheist as I have ever been, yet, also, a friend and supporter of religion? It has nothing to do with the fact that for 13 out of the last 17 years I have been employed by Jesuit, Catholic institutions. I was a professor at the College of the Holy Cross from 1991–1997, and have been, and remain at, Loyola University New Orleans from 2001 to the present.

To some, those still enthralled by the Randian vision of religion and liberty, it is bad enough for a libertarian to take a positive view of religion. For most, it will appear as nothing less than a logical contradiction for an atheist such as myself to be an actual supporter and even admirer of religion. Let me explain.

I am guided in this by the aphorism “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” While this does not always hold true, in this case I think it does.

(Read Original Article)

Topics: Freedom of Religion, White Culture and Values | No Comments »

White Boys in the Jungle

By Rob | June 19, 2008

by Sarah Maid of Albion

Travelling home by train on Friday evening, I shared a carriage with a group of white teenage boys, probably aged between sixteen and eighteen, no longer children, but not yet men, they were average if quite nice looking boys, wearing street sports clothing and speaking in the acquired “Wot I done” ‘mockney’ accents which youths of their age tend to adopt, having reached that stage in their development where speaking “properly” is thought of as somehow unmanly. Contrary to the hysteria, like most such groups, they seemed essentially pleasant well meaning kids, and whatever the media may try to suggest, quite harmless.

They were however, members of the most vulnerable and at risk section of the community.

All statistics show that young males are overwhelming the primary victims of violent crime, however, as must be patently clear to all, young white males are not amongst the primary perpetrators, especially not in the environment in which today’s youth find themselves.

It is over twenty years since I was the same age as the boys on the train, but the 1980’s were a different world to the one which they inhabit, the journey they are embarking on is a far more dangerous one than the boys I dated, danced with and had crushes on had to travel, and, if current trends continue, one which growing numbers of them will not survive.

It can not be easy being a young white male in modern society, these boys have few if any of the privileges earlier generations of white males are alleged to have had, but are held accountable for their grandfather’s “sins”, including many, which, if analysed are no more than myths. However, they are myths which are widely claimed as truth, for we live in an age when new superstitions rule, and where new myths are believed as fervently as were any medieval tales of elves and witches. Fifty years of feminist writers have conspired to strip the young male of his once heroic status and cast him as the primary villain and oppressor, whilst other agendas have been at work seeking to narrow that focus onto the white western males who largely built the modern world.

We may no longer inflict corporal punishment on our young men, but in other ways we punish them as severely as in any previous age, and we do so mainly for no other reason than that they are young men. When exploring the way society views the young male, I would recommend to you the Excellent book “The war against boys” by that most enlightened of American feminist writers Christina Hoff Summers, in which she analyses the damage which misguided forms of feminism are having on young males.

However, what the excellent Hoff Summers fails to acknowledge is that, due to political correctness, the main targets of this war are white boys, whilst non whites are excused on account of long ago and often exaggerated or misunderstood injustices. There are sections of our community, mostly white liberals, but also including some people from ethnic communities who’s desire to find fault with white boys goes beyond reason, and this phenomenon is an international one.

(Continue to Read Original Article at Sarah Maid of Albion)

Topics: A Future for White Children, Sarah Maid of Albion, White Pride World Wide | 1 Comment »

Mexican Invaders Have Declared Open-Season On American Children

By Rob | June 18, 2008

By Dave Gibson

Contrary to what President Bush claims, family values do stop at the Rio Grande for many illegal aliens. In addition to suppressing wages, driving drunk, bankrupting our hospitals, and over-crowding our jails and public schools, illegal aliens are preying upon our children.

In Operation Predator sweeps across the country conducted between 2003-2007, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents nabbed over 10,700 foreign national child molesters. Many of these predators had been previously convicted of other crimes, and many had already been deported once. The number predators apprehended in the sweeps actually only represent the tip of the iceberg.

In fact, a study conducted by the Violent Crimes Institute reports that between 1999 and 2006, there were nearly 1,000,000 sex crimes committed in the United States by illegal aliens.

Using U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration, as well as state and local law enforcement data, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute determined that there are no less than 240,000 illegal alien sex offenders currently inside the U.S.

A very cursory search on the subject of illegal aliens committing acts of child molestation turned up countless examples of the growing problem. The following are two recent ones:

-The suspect in the recent rape of a 13 year old Alabama girl is believed to be an illegal alien. Mobile County Sheriff’s detectives are looking for a man named Domingo Lorenzo for the rape which was reported on June 4.

Sheriff’s department spokesman Sgt. Jerry Taylor said: “The first thing they’re trying to do is verify his true identity. Once that’s done they’ll be able to check with immigration officials to see if he did have the proper credentials to enter the country.”

Lorenzo is known to neighbors of a West Mobile trailer park, though the owner of Ridgewood Acres claims that he has no record of Lorenzo paying rent. Many residents told reporters he is frequently on the premises.

Warren McLamore, the victim‘s father told a WKRG reporter: “My daughter doesn’t even go outside now. If she does, I just put her in the car, lock the doors, get in and get out of here.”

-On May 28, a 25 year old Mexican national named Israel Lugo Rios was arrested and charged with molesting a 3 year old Bradenton, FL girl. The little girls was taken to Manatee Memorial Hospital after complaining of pain. Upon medical examination, it was discovered that the girl had been sexually violated.

The sheriff’s department has determined that Rios is in the country illegally.

In 2007, Americans For Legal Immigration Political Action Committee (ALIPAC) tracked child sexual assaults committed by illegal aliens. In a 30 day period, they recorded 27 assaults by foreign nationals illegally inside the United States. The results are as follows: (Here for results and link to original article)

Topics: A Future for White Children, Invasion USA, Non-White Crime | No Comments »

Obama ‘The Magic Negro’ Promises Change: But What About The Jews and The Israel Lobby?

By Rob | June 17, 2008

By Justin Raimondo

The pundits agree that this election is all about “change,” so naturally we have two presidential nominees who present identical positions on the major foreign policy issue of the day: the looming prospect of the U.S. launching a “preventive” war against Iran. Shmuel Rosner, the U.S. correspondent for Ha’aretz, notes:

“The Washington Institute for Near East Policy has just published the final version of a report by the Task Force on the Future of U.S.-Israel relations. The title is appealing: How to Deepen U.S.-Israel Cooperation on the Iranian Nuclear Challenge. But no less appealing is the list of people endorsing this report: Tony Lake and Susan Rice of the Obama campaign, Vin Weber, James Woolsey of the McCain camp.”

WINEP is a think-tank associated with the America Israel Political Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the lobbying powerhouse that has made criticism of Israel on the Hill practically verboten. Obama’s recent capitulation before what is generally described as one of the most effective lobbies in Washington is underscored by Rosner:

“If you want it in a journalistic headline format, here is one way to do it: Obama, McCain advisers agree: U.S.-Israel should discuss preventive military action against Iran.”

Of course the document is much more “nuanced” than that, according to Rosner, but subtle it isn’t. The Israelis have been threatening to launch their own strike at Iran if the U.S. fails to act, and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s recent visit to Washington was widely seen as a thinly veiled attempt to impress on the Americans the seriousness of the Israelis’ resolve to stop Iran from going nuclear. Yet the immediate target of the Israelis’ wrath isn’t Tehran, but Washington. The day Olmert uttered one of his more brazen threats, the price of oil went through the roof. This is the crux of the “special relationship” between the U.S. and Israel: it’s an exemplar of how an abusive relationship functions. We allow them to blackmail us with impunity and act against our own economic and diplomatic interests. Because that’s what love – real, unconditional love – is all about…

Yes, you say, but didn’t the Iranians give up their nuclear weapons program in 2003? At least that’s what the combined efforts of U.S. intelligence services, codified [.pdf] in the latest National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, came up with. Well, the McCain/Obama Popular Front isn’t having it, because the NIE “had the unintended consequence of reducing the sense of urgency for additional pressure. The result is that the prospects for significant strengthening of international resolve to raise the cost to Iran of continuing to pursue objectionable policies in the nuclear field are less hopeful today than they were prior to the publication of the NIE.”

Why, one has to ask, is “additional pressure” necessary, if the Iranians ditched their weapons program five years ago? In the Bizarro World of the Israel lobby, however, such questions never come up. Everything is framed in terms that only have the most tenuous relationship to reality.

(Read Original Article)

Topics: The Israel Lobby in the US, War for Israel | No Comments »

Racial Identity’s Gray Area: The Definition of Whiteness Continues to Shift

By Rob | June 16, 2008

By JUNE KRONHOLZ

When Barack Obama, whose mother was white, identifies himself as black, and when Bill Richardson, whose father was white, identifies himself as Hispanic, who is white?

The U.S. Census Bureau says the country will be majority-minority in 2050 — that is, the combined number of blacks, Asians, American Indians and Hispanics will put whites in the minority. Texas and California are already there.

But the definition of white keeps shifting. Groups have been welcomed in or booted out; people opt out, sue to get in or change their minds and jump back and forth.

The deepest racial divide, between blacks and nonblacks, endures. But there also are identity shifts among African-Americans, as Sen. Obama’s success suggests. Some make it into the middle class, where education and social mobility may help shape their identities as much as race does. Others are left behind in increasingly segregated schools and neighborhoods.

The U.S. has never found it easy to assign race, although it certainly has tried. A century ago, the people who did the counting — demographers, sociologists, policy thinkers — divided whites into three strata. They considered Nordic whites, from England, Scandinavia and Germany, the most ethnically desirable and elite, followed by the Alpine whites, from eastern and central Europe, and finally the Mediterraneans. Everyone else was identified as black, red, yellow or brown, which included South Asians.

Whiteness and the privileges that came with it were so closely guarded that in 1912, a House committee held hearings on whether Italians were really Caucasian, says Thomas Guglielmo, a historian at George Washington University. The idea was picked up from Italy, where northern, lighter-skinned Italians, were asking the same questions about the southern, darker-skinned Italians, he says. No one argued seriously that Jews and Greeks, or Irish and Poles — light-skinned but poor — weren’t white, but whether they were ethnically Caucasian was up for debate, he adds.

(Read Original Article)

Topics: A Future for White Children, Race Mixing, What NOT to do for your race | 2 Comments »

The Tragedy of America’s Disappearing Fathers

By Rob | June 15, 2008

By JUAN WILLIAMS

Walter Dean Myers, a best-selling author of books for teenagers, sometimes visits juvenile detention centers in his home state of New Jersey to hold writing workshops and listen for stories about the lives of young Americans.

One day, in a juvenile facility near his home in Jersey City, a 15-year-old black boy pulled him aside for a whispered question: Why did he write in “Somewhere in the Darkness” about a boy not meeting his father because the father was in jail? Mr. Myers, a 70-year-old black man, did not answer. He waited. And sure enough, the boy, eyes down, mumbled that he had yet to meet his own father, who was in jail.

As we celebrate Father’s Day tomorrow, we should reflect upon a sad fact: It is now common to meet young people in our big city schools, foster-care homes and juvenile centers who do not know their dads. Most of those children have come face-to-face with their father at some point; but most have little regular contact with the man, or have any faith that he loves or cares about them.

When fatherless young people are encouraged to write about their lives, they tell heartbreaking stories about feeling like “throwaway people.” In the privacy of the written page, their hard, emotional shells crack open to reveal the uncertainty that comes from not knowing if their father has any interest in them. The stories are like letters to unknown dads – some filled with imaginary scenes about what it might be like to have a dad who comes home and puts his arm around you or plays with you. They feel like they’ve been thrown away, Mr. Myers says, because “they don’t have a father to push them, discipline them, and they give up trying to succeed . . . they don’t see themselves as wanted.” A regular theme of their stories is that they feel safer in a foster care home or juvenile detention center than on the outside, because they have no father to hold together the family. There is no one at home.

The extent of the problem is clear. The nation’s out-of-wedlock birth rate is 38%. Among white children, 28% are now born to a single mother; among Hispanic children it is 50% and reaches a chilling, disorienting peak of 71% for black children. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, nearly a quarter of America’s white children (22%) do not have any male in their homes; nearly a third (31%) of Hispanic children and over half of black children (56%) are fatherless.

(Read Original Article)

Topics: A Future for White Children | No Comments »

The Origins of Political Correctness

By Rob | June 15, 2008

by Bill Lind

Where does all this stuff that you’ve heard about this morning – the victim feminism, the gay rights movement, the invented statistics, the rewritten history, the lies, the demands, all the rest of it – where does it come from? For the first time in our history, Americans have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic.

  We have seen other countries, particularly in this century, where this has been the case. And we have always regarded them with a mixture of pity, and to be truthful, some amusement, because it has struck us as so strange that people would allow a situation to develop where they would be afraid of what words they used. But we now have this situation in this country. We have it primarily on college campuses, but it is spreading throughout the whole society. Were does it come from? What is it? 

  We call it “Political Correctness.” The name originated as something of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious. 

  If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.

  First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole. 

  Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state. 

  Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing. 

  Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism. 

  Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favor of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism. 

  And finally, both have a method of analysis that automatically gives the answers they want. For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired. So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness.